For AfonsinhoFor those who enjoy the thought of time before the Olympics and make an overview of the situation of professional sports, more directly than football, FIFA has been in this mess in good time.
In a model made to work like this, no one believes that a leader or politician can be a well of innocence. That does not justify anything, just makes it clear, once again, that the movements go in circles. Periods are exhausted.
FIFA works with political structures of medieval times. Confederations, federations, leagues, clubs, officials, fans (members or not) ... officials attributed to the period of the Brazilian Joao Havelange the great expansion with the inclusion of Africa, East Asia etc.. Start a discussion here. There was an expectation of growth in Africa, to make football an extraordinary way to develop the physical qualities and inventiveness of his players. Business has increased, especially in Arab countries with their petrodollars, but the quality of the performances fell. Contradiction.
To reach the major leagues, nations had to undergo the standard model. Abandoned their own ways to express themselves through sports, descaracterizaram up. It would be the price or a distortion? Meanwhile, the world is globalized. Blocs of countries are formed, they undergo disputes. Publications realize significant data, something like 38 million players, and coaches, assistants, trainers, doctors, physiologists etc.. Great clubs spread throughout the world within the logic of force.
Among financial assets, number of fans and other indices, the English are the rulers. They have three clubs in the top ten, followed by Spanish and Italian (not as economically significant). Another German, one French and one Brazilian litters the cake. In number of members, curious, we highlight the Portuguese clubs. Among the top ten, three are Lusitanian. Another discussion.
Long sought explanation for the lack of interest in clubs increase their membership, since, in principle, are groups of members. Now comes a wave of campaign partners, fans in Brazil. Another source of income, without power of decision, without effective participation in the organization of their club, but with great power of transformation. At the same time, even by such logic, there are clubs with "owners". Another contradiction.
With all the power of communication, we learn that the largest source of revenue is still negotiating players. An unpleasant surprise. Experts recommend looking for new sources, and not be dependent on just one. This whole business in times of economic crisis will not know where to stop. It is striking, for example, the situation of the Glasgow Rangers, so much tradition, threatened with closure.
Fifa president acknowledges the charges against their peers from the board, while admitting his continued performance of numerous (in all senses) contracts with numerous sponsors. For those who want change, where is the horizon? What can you imagine how much time and change? There was a time when many differences threatened the relationship between FIFA and UEFA, and maybe some other confederation. Disagreements were worked, but it is unclear to what extent resolved. Any weakness in this game stimulates turmoil as high interest.
Meanwhile, in what situation it will hold the World Cup 2014 in Brazil? Domestically, the confusion is not small. The policy seems calmed, but you never know ... Also here the stakes are enormous. The mismatch of the organization of parties, clubs and associations is very large. The representation of the players, characterized by weakness, seems not to bother, but needs to mature.
Championships in the minor divisions, started with great delay, instability is the hallmark. An uncertainty weakens bad football as a whole. They back the trouble with travel by the strategy or lack thereof in the distribution of the airlines made by CBF, assuming these expenses, but not ready for it. The players are sacrificed in shifts inconsistent.
I've been there a hundred leagues in famous clubs all over the country travel were shared between airlines without technical criteria. There were many troubles in hotels and airports.
In a model made to work like this, no one believes that a leader or politician can be a well of innocence. That does not justify anything, just makes it clear, once again, that the movements go in circles. Periods are exhausted.
FIFA works with political structures of medieval times. Confederations, federations, leagues, clubs, officials, fans (members or not) ... officials attributed to the period of the Brazilian Joao Havelange the great expansion with the inclusion of Africa, East Asia etc.. Start a discussion here. There was an expectation of growth in Africa, to make football an extraordinary way to develop the physical qualities and inventiveness of his players. Business has increased, especially in Arab countries with their petrodollars, but the quality of the performances fell. Contradiction.
To reach the major leagues, nations had to undergo the standard model. Abandoned their own ways to express themselves through sports, descaracterizaram up. It would be the price or a distortion? Meanwhile, the world is globalized. Blocs of countries are formed, they undergo disputes. Publications realize significant data, something like 38 million players, and coaches, assistants, trainers, doctors, physiologists etc.. Great clubs spread throughout the world within the logic of force.
Among financial assets, number of fans and other indices, the English are the rulers. They have three clubs in the top ten, followed by Spanish and Italian (not as economically significant). Another German, one French and one Brazilian litters the cake. In number of members, curious, we highlight the Portuguese clubs. Among the top ten, three are Lusitanian. Another discussion.
Long sought explanation for the lack of interest in clubs increase their membership, since, in principle, are groups of members. Now comes a wave of campaign partners, fans in Brazil. Another source of income, without power of decision, without effective participation in the organization of their club, but with great power of transformation. At the same time, even by such logic, there are clubs with "owners". Another contradiction.
With all the power of communication, we learn that the largest source of revenue is still negotiating players. An unpleasant surprise. Experts recommend looking for new sources, and not be dependent on just one. This whole business in times of economic crisis will not know where to stop. It is striking, for example, the situation of the Glasgow Rangers, so much tradition, threatened with closure.
Fifa president acknowledges the charges against their peers from the board, while admitting his continued performance of numerous (in all senses) contracts with numerous sponsors. For those who want change, where is the horizon? What can you imagine how much time and change? There was a time when many differences threatened the relationship between FIFA and UEFA, and maybe some other confederation. Disagreements were worked, but it is unclear to what extent resolved. Any weakness in this game stimulates turmoil as high interest.
Meanwhile, in what situation it will hold the World Cup 2014 in Brazil? Domestically, the confusion is not small. The policy seems calmed, but you never know ... Also here the stakes are enormous. The mismatch of the organization of parties, clubs and associations is very large. The representation of the players, characterized by weakness, seems not to bother, but needs to mature.
Championships in the minor divisions, started with great delay, instability is the hallmark. An uncertainty weakens bad football as a whole. They back the trouble with travel by the strategy or lack thereof in the distribution of the airlines made by CBF, assuming these expenses, but not ready for it. The players are sacrificed in shifts inconsistent.
I've been there a hundred leagues in famous clubs all over the country travel were shared between airlines without technical criteria. There were many troubles in hotels and airports.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário